<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
			
			<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
			<title>madfellas - Crap</title>
			<link>http://www.madfellas.com/blog/index.cfm</link>
			<description></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:31:52 -0700</pubDate>
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:38:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
			<generator>BlogCFC</generator>
			<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
			<managingEditor>justin.w.carter@gmail.com</managingEditor>
			<webMaster>justin.w.carter@gmail.com</webMaster>
			
			<item>
				<title>Safari 3 font &quot;smoothing&quot; = font blurring</title>
				<link>http://www.madfellas.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/6/12/Safari-3-font-smoothing--font-blurring</link>
				<description>
				
				&lt;p&gt;No doubt you&apos;ve seen that today Apple launched the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/safari/&quot;&gt;Safari 3 beta&lt;/a&gt; which includes support for Windows. And if you&apos;ve installed it then no doubt you&apos;ve seen the complete mess it makes on your screen when displaying text...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, I&apos;m not talking about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://labnol.blogspot.com/2007/06/fix-fonts-issues-in-safari-3-for.html&quot;&gt;expected issues that come with beta software&lt;/a&gt;, I&apos;m talking about Apple&apos;s great font &quot;smoothing&quot; algorithm that makes text look like it has been bolded, outlined and then bolded a bit more for good measure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I previously thought this font &quot;smoothing&quot; was just a &quot;feature&quot; of Macs. I have a 17&quot; iMac G5 at work which I use for testing purposes (and other forms of target practice), and after &lt;em&gt;trying&lt;/em&gt; to use the lightest possible font smoothing the text was still insanely bold so I just figured it was part and parcel of using OS X.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, Safari comes to Windows, and what have Apple done?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;OH MY GOD, MY EYES, THEY BURN!~&lt;/strong&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here are two screenshots for comparison. The &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; text in these screenshots that should appear to be bold is the blue text used for the headings and links:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;IE7 / FireFox 2 / Opera 9 with ClearType&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.madfellas.com/blog/images/upload/font-ie7.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;u&gt;Safari 3 beta &quot;font smoothing&quot; aka font blurring&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.madfellas.com/blog/images/upload/font-safari.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; necessary to make the text so fat? All the shapely characteristics that make each letter of a typeface easily distinguishable from the others have been blurred into the next dimension! Normal text isn&apos;t supposed to be bold, and bold text isn&apos;t supposed to be black!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Apple, don&apos;t bring this crappy font blurring algorithm to Windows when we already have ClearType doing an infinitely superior job...&lt;/p&gt; 
				</description>
				
				<category>Crap</category>				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 04:38:00 -0700</pubDate>
				<guid>http://www.madfellas.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/6/12/Safari-3-font-smoothing--font-blurring</guid>
				
			</item>
			</channel></rss>